Home Forums General Discussion Sins of the flesh?

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1417 Reply
    Joe
    Guest

    This is probably a silly question, but: we ask know that fornication is a sin, but so is overindulgence…so, is there a need for an “orthodox and fat” website? Or “orthodox and vain?” Does every sin and every sinner need its own website? I have found a lot of good stuff here… don’t get me wrong, but will we ever see the “wife-beater and Orthodox” web site? What makes our “sin” so unique? Could it be that it’s not a sin?

    #1418 Reply
    Joe
    Guest

    All know, not ask know

    #1421 Reply
    Maria
    Guest

    I would argue it’s not a sin. Please forgive me if I misunderstand you, but I find comparing being gay with being gluttonous or vanity offensive. :/

    #1425 Reply
    Joe
    Guest

    You are right Maria… I could’ve worded that better… I meant to say that I think being gay is not a sin, and the idea that it is a sin, (or at least the idea that all homosexual behavior is fornication) is the reason for the existence of this site… At least I think that’s what I meant; I was half asleep when I wrote it. 🙂

    #1426 Reply
    Maria
    Guest

    Oh okay, I see. No problem 🙂

    #1467 Reply
    Joe
    Guest

    Yeah, in retrospect, I wish I hadn’t posted this topic… It doesn’t even make sense and it came from a place of anger… Please disregard

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
Reply To: Sins of the flesh?
Your information:




Comments are closed.